You have invested in the new HR software, why are you not seeing the return on investment?
You have just spent a huge amount of time and money implementing a new HR recruitment system and while it has helped greatly, the results are still not as good as you had expected.
This is one of the most common things that I hear from organisations whom I work with. There was a great buzz and excitement created around HR and IT when the software was purchased, a great plan was put in place, training was carried out and detailed user guides were distributed, yet:
- Reporting still does not add up – users are not using the software correctly and as a result the data used for reporting is inaccurate
- Applicants are still not been corresponded to in a timely manner and are ringing up HR for feedback even though this software should make this task very easy for users to carry out
- Hiring Managers are complaining that they don’t like the system and “preferred the old way”
- Senior Management are complaining that they don’t have instant access to the key metrics they want for financial planning
- External recruitment consultants are unhappy that they have to go through an agency portal instead of having direct access to hiring managers
I’m guessing that if you have been responsible for the implementation of a HR recruitment system that some of these sound familiar. If you have and they are not, PLEASE respond and tell me your secrets!!
The process of change management includes planning in a thoughtful and sensitive way whilst ensuring that you consult and involve those who are affected by the changes. Trying to force change on people even if you absolutely believe the change will be better for them can result in problems.
Before implementing the change it is important to set your objectives and ensure that they are realistic, measurable and achievable. Many organisations implement technology with a loose set of objectives or specific ones but no means to measure if they get there or indeed if they are on the correct path to get there.
While it is important to recognise the stake holders involved in the change it is very important to understand who will be affected most by this and why they will be affected.
As with stages of grief there are said to be stages in adapting to change:
- Shock
- Defensive retreat
- Acknowledgement
- Acceptance & Adaptation
If yours is an organisation with a culture of continuous rather than discontinuous change this will be easier to manage but none the less it still must be managed.
You must assume that there will be issues to overcome regarding change and put plans in place to address these.
People who may be affected can be internal or external. Internal examples may include stakeholders, other departments, HR users and hiring managers
External examples could include job agencies, job board account managers, and applicants.
These people will have different reasons for having difficulties in changing and the degrees of which will differ but none the less it is a change for all of them.
It is important to recognise where people are in the process and rather than force them through the stages, empathise and understand and facilitate them moving through to acceptance & adaptation.
In the early stage of the project however there are a number of steps which you can take to help minimise the amount of issues which you will face and make a smoother change.
Consult with the people who will be affected as the change must involve them not be imposed on them. By feeling more a sense of ownership over what is happening they may be more likely to try and adapt more quickly.
If appropriate arrange workshops to help achieve understanding, involvement and understanding
Encourage management to use face to face communication where the chance is of a sensitive nature
Identify “fears” that people may have and allow you to address them when presenting your document and the new system to others.
Ensure that fears about how this will be used are addressed by ensuring adequate training, user guides, available help and process mapping.
Map out the benefits which are available to each unit affected so that they can see how it is of benefit not only to them but also to the organisation as a whole
Company |
|
Human Resources |
|
Hiring Managers |
|
Others |
|